Click to donate to Esther Rockett’s legal defence

Or contact Esther via the tab above to offer a loan

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Universal Medicine is toxic to children

Serge Benhayon’s sexually explicit rants and his exorcism stage act are harmful enough to children without his damaging anti-family brainwashing. Within the messiah’s perverse occult philosophy is the recipe for shattering families, and the sickest teachings are arguably his pronouncements on the female body, rhetorically assaulting the physical bonds between mothers and babies. On top of being subjected to harmful practices, Universal Medicine cult children are deprived of nurturing and responsible parenting in the name of ‘healing’ and ‘self-love’. 

NSW Child Protection Helpline 132 111

Destruction of families

Many of our readers know well how allegiance to Universal Medicine takes primacy over all other relationships, and blind devotion sees followers subjecting their kids to a range of exploitations and abuses, as listed in the post on Serge Benhayon’s inappropriate behaviours with children. However, there wasn’t room in that post to examine the teachings that facilitate toxic parenting.

Benhayon seeks to monopolize the devotion of followers, and like many cult leaders, he doesn’t draw the line at separating parents from children. In some cults it’s done by removing children into creches or boarding schools, but in UM, while familial engagement is reduced by parents’ increasing commitment to UM activities, children suffer most from the loss of quality engagement when the family member follows the guru’s instructions for shutting down their essential humanity.

Encouraged to reject their own families, followers’ investment in UM is framed as the acquisition of ‘in truth’ ‘love’ and a new family of ‘Brothers’ and ‘Sons of God’. Benhayon’s antisocial teachings make healthy and harmonious relationships impossible and ensure followers are only able to relate to others adhering to the same oppressive regime – shallowly at that.

Twisted teachings – emotionless self-love and neglected children

The Esoteric Relationships post looked at Serge’s sociopathic view that expressing emotion is a sign of weakness, and that love must be void of emotion to be ‘true’.

Love is not emotional; it is an emanating presence that has not one ounce of emotion in it, but the emanating aspect of the joy and harmony that is God. (Benhayon, 2006, p.26)

The punishment is disease and possibly death.

Be well reminded that all disease and illness comes from emotions. (Benhayon, 2007, p. 421)

He tells us emotional needs are symptomatic of an underlying disorder of the soul.

The separation to self creates the emotional clinging we have to others. This is not union or connection in-truth. It is attachment driven by needs. The need is to fill the emptiness and so we impose on others to give us what we refuse to give to ourselves – self love. (Benhayon, 2007, p.395)

Children are thus also supposed to psychologically sustain themselves on self-love.

There are far too many spiritual based constructs making up what is known as motherhood and fatherhood. They make parenting a box-ticking exercise. Learn to love yourself in full, and that love will parent your children like no other parenting can. (Benhayon, 2011, p.474)

If you love your children with and from emotional love, you are just passing down to another generation a form of love that has not ever worked. (Benhayon, 2011, p.693)

The degradation of empathy – a sentiment essential to meaningful connection with others has left many of us stunned by the callous, self serving behaviour of loved ones who were once warm, sociable and caring people. Followers are held to ransom by demented platitudes.

Sympathy and empathy are both emotions. Emotions are poisonous to our physical body, for they are indulgent energies that help the spirit individualise. (Benhayon, 2011, p. 283)

Esoteric Motherhood 

The Esoteric Feminism post looked briefly at Benhayon’s jaundiced ideas on motherhood, which deliberately seek to alienate mothers from their babies. Benhayon does not teach that motherhood, with it’s full range of emotional expression, is a positive and developmental experience for both mother and child. Instead he suggests caring for children necessitates mothers sacrifice self nurturing, and follows with the atrocious suggestion that a lack of self centredness leads to the development of cancer.

Lack of self-nurturing is now a significant global problem and in particular for women, as it is the actual energetic cause of breast cancer and its ill rise in our societies everywhere. (Benhayon, 2011, p.518)

He says that caring for a baby has to be done at the expense of one’s connection with self. Again, the consequences are dire, and magically lead to health disorders.

After giving birth, the connection a woman has had with her femaleness leaves unless, of course, she has her own connection to her self. Post natal depression is the disconnection of the femaleness that was there only because of the pregnancy and not from her choice to be in femaleness. (Benhayon, 2011, p.525)

When a woman does not have her periods for many months after giving birth, it is because she has put all her focus on mothering and disregarded herself as a woman. (Benhayon, 2011, p.520)

Babies are expected to survive on the self-love emanating from self involved parents, who shut themselves down so they can love without emotion.

We have been confusing love for a baby with the enormous need they have of us. Too many foster that need so that the dependency keeps them needed as the child grows. This is not love – it is a form of control that is used to cover up for the adult who was not shown true love when they were young. (Benhayon, 2011, p.693)

Once mothers have been set with the impossible task of denying the emotional requirements of themselves and their babies, Benhayon then sabotages physical bonds, degrading breasts and reproductive organs as little more than focal locations for emotionally generated disease.

There is an enormous energetic difference between breastfeeding a child and just hooking them onto the breast to feed. Breastfeeding is first and foremost a nurturing act, a deeply established loving connection the child feels well before it is a nourishment its body needs. And if one is just ‘feeding’ as a function, what message or feelings does the child feel? (Benhayon, 2011, p. 520)

Babies can feel the emotions in mothers milk which may cause them to choke on it. (Esoteric Development Group lecture notes taken by Michael Dixon, February 19, 2011)

It’s little wonder readers have told us cult mothers have grown increasingly depressed while breastfeeding – hurriedly, and no doubt prematurely, weaning babies – in spite of famous paediatrician, Dr Howard Chilton’s glowing endorsements of Serge. Perhaps Dr Chilton can explain how a mother goes about nurturing and loving without emotion. And once she is suitably repressed, how she succeeds in feeding a child  emotionlessly without it feeling like nothing more than a ‘function’.

Pompous half wit.

The confusion instilled by that rot forms part of the marketing of Esoteric Breast Massage.

If there is no nurturing energy in the breasts the baby suckling will receive the milk, but will not get the nurturing energy. All is energy, and if the breasts are not clear when the baby is feeding, the baby will also receive the ill-energy that is in the breasts. This aspect is revelatory and unique to this process. Put simply, we now have a true choice about the actual quality of our feeding milk. (Original Esoteric Breast Massage Site, erased when media scrutiny commmenced.)

Like all Esoteric Women’s Health abuses, EBM’s body negative, sexist programming brainwashes women to fixate on self-loving choices and ‘clearing’ their polluted bodies, while their children’s needs go to hell. It’s an Esoteric marketing triumph, wresting the allegiance of followers from their dependents into an expensive therapy habit – maximising their emotional and financial investment in UM.

Creating interpersonal havoc

Idiotic sexist stereotypes and other damaging platitudes, as discussed in the Esoteric Parenting post, are designed to strain familial relationships to breaking point. Universal Law solicitors are on stand by to help with the divorce and property settlements, freeing up assets to be spent on or donated to UM.

Mothers attempt to make their young sons all that is lacking in and from their husbands/partners. This is one of the first forms of rejection for the yet to be man. (Benhayon, 2011, p.558)

A man identifies with his physical strength at a very early age. If this does not work, he will escape into his mind not long thereafter and use that as his strength. We ought to let our young boys feel who they truly are and NOT tell them what they need to be. (Benhayon, 2011, p.560)

Understand that men have a long way to heal and recover who they truly are. But you women be patient, for it is you who have allowed him to stray that far by accepting anything less than true love. (Benhayon, 2011, p.563)

The more problems we have with our partner, the more we tend to emotionally love our kids. Ponder on this before you recoil from it’s truth. (Benhayon, 2011, p. 384)

Misrepresenting children as a licence for neglect

While adults are infantilized in UM, children are portrayed as having superior levels of intuition. Their emotional and other developmental requirements are thus downplayed, which gives cult members permission for disengaged parenting.

Children do not need clairsentience to be taught, just enhanced…

Young children naturally live by it. Children just know it; they just don’t get asked or are not encouraged or are not acknowledged by it. They live in the connection of the interconnectedness until the current system and our current way of life stops supporting what they know to be a natural truth…the adults sustaining this separative way of existing were once the children that only knew the livingness of one. (Benhayon, 2007, pp. 368-371)

Finally, the following exchange illustrates a range of Benhayon’s prejudices – his rigidly distorted definition of ‘love’, his deification of childhood naivety, his enmity to education and fact based truth, his insistence on placing intuition at odds with thinking sensibly, and his fixation with paedophilia. His followers regard him as the ‘voice from heaven for our times’

SERGE: …So self love is an easy thing to do if the firm determination is there to only think, feel and experience the energy of love and self love. When the firm determination is there to do that then, there is no opening left for the outer to intrude and cause YOU a disturbance.

DS: It’s common sense but our education took us away from this.

SERGE: The influences keep us from the simple truth.

DS: It comes down to our intuition doesn’t it.

SERGE: The proof of that is the fact that the first five years of our life we are exclusively clair- sentient and we do not intellectualize anything, unless of course we are tampered with sexually or things like that. Kids are clairsentient, which means been aware of feelings. We teach them to think from the head -when they are trying to communicate instead of from the heart. (Interview D.Simpson, Serge Benhayon, May 2004, p.10 )

Universal Medicine’s ‘healthy self-loving choices’ are nothing more than a formula for followers to become emotionally stunted, self obsessed sycophants. Benhayon’s teachings ensure nothing comes between them and their investment in the entranced dehumanization of the Livingness Death Package.

Least of all their kids.

All enabled, endorsed and promoted by three numbskulled psychologists, Marianna Masiorski, Brendan Mooney and Caroline Raphael, and seven medical doctors; Dr Samuel Kim, Dr Maxine Szramka, Dr Jane Barker, Dr Elizabeth Skinner, Dr Eunice Minford, Dr Anne Malatt and famous paediatrician, Dr Howard Chilton.

Serge Benhayon’s inappropriate behaviour with children

NSW Child Protection Helpline 132 111

Benhayon, S. The Way It Is, UniMed Publishing, Goonellabah, 2006

Benhayon, S. A Treatise on Consciousness, UniMed Publishing, Goonellabah, 2007

Benhayon, S. Esoteric Teachings & Revelations, UniMed Publishing, Goonellabah, 2011

Advertisements

6 Comments on “Universal Medicine is toxic to children”

  1. ‘The proof of that is the fact that the first five years of our life we are exclusively clair- sentient and we do not intellectualize anything, unless of course we are tampered with sexually or things like that.’

    Serge says so.

    So children who exhibit intellectual tendencies must have been sexually abused??

    ‘or things like that.’

    Things like that?? Things like what? What ‘things’ are ‘like’ paedophilia, Serge?

    WHAT!?

    • MacReady says:

      So, children are Clair-sentient unless they are sexually abused, which they deserve because that only happens if they were child abusers in previous lives, right Serge?

      Once again, we see that the so-called “Ancient Wisdom” is actually deranged bullshit.

      Serge knows (thanks to treatment room confessionals) that many of his predominately female followers have a history of childhood sexual abuse. What an insidious way to tantalize them with empty promises. “By doing the work you are returning to your divine state of clair-sentience, which you had as a child until you were tampered with sexually, but you had that coming because you were an abuser in a past life. But don’t worry, the Ascended Masters were all pedophiles too, and you can clear your karma just like they did. By the way, it used to take multiple lifetimes to clear the karma of such extreme transgressions, but now it can be done in one lifetime. I should know, because I took a holy shit and became an Ascended Master”

  2. you know who says:

    The proof? Oh boy. More numbskullery from the numbskull himself.

    You think Howard Chilton (his son’s father in law…) should be able to tell Serge that in the first five years of life our brains are developing. Connections are being made which will form our the mature mind. Our pre-frontal cortex- the area where we do our thinking- is not well formed. It starts to kick in around six or seven years of age (but in some cases never. I am looking at you Serge).Ergo, it is not possible for a child to intellectualize. Basically Serge is convincing his students that the ideal state for them is when they were bereft of the ability to form critical thought. Why does that sound so right? And talk about infantalizing.

    We have to teach children to use their heads because that is the ONLY place we can think from. What Sterge is suggesting is the same as saying: “We tell people to use their hearts to pump blood, when they should use their brains!” It’s counter-logical, but I guess that’s the point. The real issue is that people are not using their brains, because if they were they’d see clearly that that statement, and all others Serge makes are bullshit, and the utterance of an idiot.

    We should be taught critical thinking at school as prerequisite to life. From about seven or eight. We should also be taught how to recognize sociopaths. Here’s the signs:

    #1) Sociopaths are charming.
    #2) Sociopaths are more intense than other people.
    #3) Sociopaths are incapable of feeling shame, guilt or remorse.
    #4) Sociopaths invent outrageous lies about [themselves and] their experiences.
    #5) Sociopaths seek to dominate others and “win” at all costs. They hate to lose any argument or fight and will viciously defend their web of lies, even to the point of logical absurdity.
    #6) Sociopaths tend to be highly intelligent, but they use their brainpower to deceive others rather than empower them.
    #7) Sociopaths are incapable of love and are entirely self-serving. They may feign love or compassion in order to get what they want, but they don’t actually FEEL love in the way that you or I do.
    #8) Sociopaths speak poetically. They are master wordsmiths, able to deliver a running “stream of consciousness” monologue that is both intriguing and hypnotic. They are expert storytellers and even poets.
    #9) Sociopaths never apologize

    We should also learn the basic rule that what people talk about can ONLY be what is inside their heads. For some reason this very simple observations seems to escape most people. Serge’s ‘philosophy’ is the contents of his minds spewed over six or seven books, websites and emails. It tells the story of someone with big ideas about themselves, a fantastical world they’ve created to make themselves important, and a person with some very big problems.

    The few quotes above speak volumes on that.

    Any parent in the group who makes the grave error of believing that education takes something away from a child- because they themselves are too stupid to use their own critical thinking to see through Serge’s lies and fantasies- is indulging in a form of serious and irreversible child abuse.

    We don’t think with our hearts. Intuition is not mystical. There is no higher brain, other than the part just behind your forehead. The best tool for anyone is to have their higher cognitive functions tuned up and working the best they can.

    Serge’s BS is a recipe for a life lost in a shadow world of half developed ideas and mistaken beliefs.

    I give you the cult.

  3. Lord of Form says:

    “Come 2012, people will see that these people are not so calm, that there is an agitation in them as well, that what they are doing is not real and that they are only protected from the realities of life which makes them not as erratic as most people. But give them the slightest semblance of what it is like to live in reality, and they will be caught, on camera, by their followers and others. To sustain that lie will be impossible when the true Love is closer to them. So many more gurus will be caught out and exposed and their greed and self-motivation exposed.”- SB

    What…. like having your charities exposed as self-serving scams?
    Or looking scared shitless on TV ?
    Or sending fake press releases at 3AM after being caught on camera exposed as a cult leader ? (AKA false guru)
    Or lying through your teeth to journalists about your bankruptcy or your many incarnations?

    False Guru- It’s his own epithet.

  4. Anonymous says:

    Well well well clair- sentient. I was told told by a dim wit so proclaimed Serge follower that she was clair- sentient although a smoker, part timer drinker (when she wanted) She told me she could read peoples energy……. Blah blah I clearly remember when she was recruiting my partner, when I came home from an honest days work they laughed as I came up the stairs….. I asked hey what’s so funny….. She said that her and I had an affair in our past life………
    I replied…….. “Was it good” lol
    I don’t remember??……… Glad I can’t.
    She was recruiting and an employee of a local business Esoteric Soulutions which is a major scam to the locals of Mackay QLD.
    She moved away to the Sunny Coast with no responsibility of who she effected in our region.
    Another thing I remember is that the local proprietress had the ability to calibrate her practice and KNEW before even when you walked through the door the energy of the appointment?? Wow. Mmm. There was another employee that was involved with this business that does not work there any more and has not for quite awhile. I will find out who this person is and ask for their experiences. I have good friends who’s wives have been to this practice and experienced that the proprietor encourages division between husband and wife. I notified a good friend early when I smelt a rat to discourage him from allowing his wife to attend this kind of counselling. They have continued life happy with a great family atmosphere. Well worth the effort. These people are predators. As most will know the people that are involved with this cult are repressed and do not have a life based on what they choose in life but what Serge encourages and even then break the “rules” when it suits them. They preach to family, customers, and friends but fail continually thanks to the ability of most to differentiate between bullshit and scam. People that are weak for what ever reason are vulnerable can be sucked in for a lot of bucks,
    I’m a great believer in freedom and this is definitely is not freedom but repression. People that cash in on this are scum in its truest form and that I will never lie down for.
    Thank you everyone that have the balls or other parts to stand up to these numbties as the truth will always trump bullshit.
    Do not be afraid to tell your stories as they cannot ever, ever control your truth and experiences as they try to protect what they have done and try to achieve.
    Truth will always trump bullshit.
    Especially when books have been published. New Years messages have been aired and the very obvious change this cult has experienced since the exposure on all forms of media.
    Serge was very keen when the TV channel 7 did a interview with him and people said WTF. Now he hides behind everyone else. In business and life you are accountable as the leader.
    OK supporters where is he now..?
    He is a very weak person! (he is not a so called man!!)